Wednesday, March 7, 2012

China's 'Occupy men's toilet' drive inspires Pune women - India News - IBNLive

China's 'Occupy men's toilet' drive inspires Pune women - India News - IBNLive:

Pune: The 'Occupy Men's Toilet' campaign started by women in China to protest against the lack of sanitation facilities for them is beginning to grip the imagination of women in the city.

Activists, working women and college students are now saying that if the 78 newly elected women representatives in the civic house do nothing on the issue, they will launch a similar drive in the city.

The PMC has been allocating money for women's toilets since 2009 and it even decided to build toilets under the JNNURM. Toilet projects were also mooted on a buy, own and transfer (BOT) basis. But precious little has come of it, and three years on none of the projects have progressed beyond the drawing board.

China's 'Occupy men's toilet' drive inspires Pune women
Mid-Day.com

"In 2009, Rs 60 lakh was allocated for public toilets and this was increased to Rs 1 crore in 2010. It is not the funds but lack of political will that is responsible for the lack of toilets in the city," said RTI activist Vijay Kumbhar.

The PMC decided that public toilets would be built on BOT basis. "The standing committee pulled back its proposal of building fibre public toilets since the material is not conducive to our health," Kumbhar said.

According to the World Health Organisation, there should be one public toilet for every 100 people. In the city, there is one public toilet for 9,100 people.

Activist Mukta Manohar said it was unfortunate that women had to fight for these basic amenities.

"When thousands of people hit the streets in protest against such apathy, the administration will have no option but to take notice," Manohar said.

She also said that the upcoming Women's Day was just the right occasion to conduct such protests.

Health activist Chetan Gandhi, who has been raising the issue of separate public toilets for women for the past few years, said the PMC had only reserved 63 blocks for public toilets and that too on a temporary basis.

"Infections and kidney stone are the most common problems among women," Gandhi said.

Woman activist Vidya Bal even petitioned the high court in this regard in September.

"Besides protesting on the streets, it's the responsibility of newly elected women corporators to take up this issue in the General Body meeting. This time women corporators already outnumber men. If they ignore the issue, they have no right to sit in the House," Bal said.

Neha Visani, a student of Wadia College, said, "Women should be provided the same facilities that men enjoy. A movement like the Occupy Men's Toilet in China must be initiated here. Even the pay toilets are filthy as ever.

Are the women who have their menstrual cycles or those who are pregnant supposed to sit at home to avail of clean washrooms?"

Esha Goyal, an executive with a marketing firm said women must shed inhibitions and raise their voice against such injustice.

Nikita Smyth, a student, said, "The movement in China is perfectly logical. Where else will the women go if there are toilets only for men all around? It is a bold step but we must not hesitate to take such steps if pushed against the wall."

Former mayors blame citizens for opposing toilets in their respective area and raising hygiene issues.

Former mayor Mohansingh Rajpal said that he had made a budgetary provision of Rs 2 crore in his tenure but he could complete only 60 per cent of the work. "At least 25 locations were opposed by the citizens and the project was further delayed because of administrative issues," he said.

Rajpal's predecessor Rajalaxmi Bhosale said she too had proposed a Rs 1 crore project but the PMC could not find land for the structures. Bhosale, who was first elected in 1997, constructed five units in Hadapsar.

China's equal toilet rights movement

Fed up with long queues for women at public toilets, 23-year-old student Li Tingting and 20 other women marched into a men's public toilet in the southern Chinese city of Guangzhou carrying colourful placards calling for equal waiting times for both men and women. Tingting now plans to take her protest to Beijing, where China's leaders will gather next month for the annual meeting of the country's parliament.


'via Blog this'

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Nanavati Commission Report and the UPA Government - Sandip K. Dasverma

A massacre is a massacre and the perpetrators should be punished, irrespective of who they are. I believe the perpetrators are cowards and opportunists, who believe they can get away with no punishment, even for murder. This encourages others to the follow suit. If 1984 criminals had have been punished swiftly, the1993 Bombay pogroms would not have happened, nor the 2002 genocide in Gujarat. Because the criminals in 2002 would have known that there were noose and gallows for murder, at the end of the day. In all fairness, there must be exemplary punishment for both the politicians and the policemen (including those retired) to ensure that no person gets away putting another's life in jeopardy or end, by his acts of omission or commission.

The politicians like Sajjan Kumar, Jagdish Tytler, Vasant Sathe, H. K. L. Bhagat and others should be punished both by prohibiting their participation in elections (their source of power) and prosecuting them for their culpability. After all there are nearly 2800 dead bodies even per the Government of India(GOI) report and own admission,, though the unofficial count is more than 4000. Following the crooked precedence established by the colonial British Raj, even today citizens can't get a reliable figure from their own government. Be it as it may. But if there are 2800 dead bodies and not even 28 going to gallows or even getting life sentences, there is something seriously wrong with the government. People are aghast at this mockery of justice.

It is outrageous to advance the plea that H. K. L. Bhagat should not be bothered as he is old and sick. I think this exculpatory nonsense must stop. The international standards are now being set by the prosecution of 90-year old Pinochet of Chile. Why so much compassion for a low life, who did not have the same consideration for others? I remember he was given the benefit of doubt by a previous commission, while a widow and her husband's dead body were given no credence! Such is the bias of the Indian judicial system in favor of the rich and powerful. What the commissions, nine of them over 20 years, have done is to spend public money, enormous amounts of it to chip away, from the list of the accused, one at a time. And always some pliable judges have been rewarded with remunerative appointments, be it in the Congress or BJP regime.

This culture of crime and its condonement must change once and for all if India is to get anywhere. We remain in the list of most corrupt nations, i.e., the list of least transparent nations, and yet continue clamoring for acceptance as a world leader. Unless we cleanse the institutional rot, like the compromised judiciary, the powerful will continue buying their way out, and rule of law will be a distant dream.

This brings us to the very vital point of speed, the prime problem in the judicial trials in India. If criminal cases linger far too long (by design the accused always engineer it), then everyone will grow old and on "compassionate grounds" the criminals would be let go, even if they don't die naturally. The government's performance should be judged by how efficiently it can deliver justice and how soon, if it has to claim a seat in the comity of nations. That is timeliness has a value, every one in the world now understands except the Indian bureaucracyand the judiciary. We must have a fast track courts, which should conclude such cases within two years. Yes, well before the next election, at most. Thus we can judge the UPA government by its actions whether it is truly secular or just expediently so? Then people in India can decide whether
they commend or condemn such acts.

There is need for a law that stipulates that those names that are recurring in nine reports should be asked to prove that they are not guilty. And this should be done expeditiously so that the affected and wronged families feel that justice was done. That way people will be sure, there is a fair chance of grievances of the small fry, being addressed.

Having a Sikh Prime Minister does not mitigate the crimes or absolve the state of its failure to punish the criminals. If tomorrow the BJP in its turn appoints a Muslim as the CM of their next Government in Gujarat, for example, it will not be absolved of the crimes of Narendra Modi government. For that matter not even if they install a Muslim as the PM in India. There should be a parallel process, another fast track court, to try and convict all the police officials and administrative staff, including those either retired or preparing to retire soon.

Again, enough resources should be put on the table for the whole process to be finished in just two years or before. This is equally important, nay more important, because it will set the standards for the present and future police against colluding with the politicians in power. Punishment even after retirement, amended laws, and removal of procedural bottlenecks along
the way, will firmly ensure that justice prevails. The vestiges of colonial rule need to disappear. Then only sycophancy will have been made risky and punishment for crime inescapably established.

May I request Dr. Manmohan Singh, the head of the Congress-led UPA Government, Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, the head of the Congress party, their left allies, and the bureaucracy et al for once to rise above cronyism, and let the law take its course with exemplary swiftness of modern societies in the world that India aspires to become a leading light, of?